77
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 182:
Line 182: + +
→Falsifiability
:::Aschlafly, if you want to expand the living daylights out of the "Controversy" section, I'll be right there by your side, cheering you on and helping in any way I can. As long as your contributions aren't misleading or incorrect. I don't want to speak for anyone else, but my gut tells me that EvanW and MarkGall would make the same promise. So why are we still bickering? Can't we improve the article instead? I know having to respond here is taking away from the time I set aside today to add to the [[general theory of relativity]] article. --[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 10:54, 13 November 2009 (EST)
:::Aschlafly, if you want to expand the living daylights out of the "Controversy" section, I'll be right there by your side, cheering you on and helping in any way I can. As long as your contributions aren't misleading or incorrect. I don't want to speak for anyone else, but my gut tells me that EvanW and MarkGall would make the same promise. So why are we still bickering? Can't we improve the article instead? I know having to respond here is taking away from the time I set aside today to add to the [[general theory of relativity]] article. --[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 10:54, 13 November 2009 (EST)
KSorenson, ASchlafly is an expert and fully qualified to write on on astrophysics as well as on American history, world history, climate sciences, mathematics, microbiology, oncology, mathematics, statistics, Theology, ancient languages, the law and economics. I suggest that instead of trying to relegate his valuable insights to a "controversy," that you open your mind and learn from him, as we all have. [[User:MichaelHWC|MichaelHWC]] 11:08, 13 November 2009 (EST)