Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,555 bytes added ,  17:29, November 13, 2009
no edit summary
Line 197: Line 197:     
:::::: Evan, I appreciate your comments and have learned from them.  My question was directed at KSorenson and Mark, not to you.  But using your answer, it doesn't explain the insistence by liberals on downplaying or even censoring criticism of black holes.  And one key question is unanswered:  if promoting black holes caused people to read the Bible less, would you want to promote them?  They certainly won't ever help anyone, while the Bible might.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:22, 13 November 2009 (EST)
 
:::::: Evan, I appreciate your comments and have learned from them.  My question was directed at KSorenson and Mark, not to you.  But using your answer, it doesn't explain the insistence by liberals on downplaying or even censoring criticism of black holes.  And one key question is unanswered:  if promoting black holes caused people to read the Bible less, would you want to promote them?  They certainly won't ever help anyone, while the Bible might.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:22, 13 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::::Aschlafly, you seem to be more interested in arguing (now apparently about politics and religion of all things) than you are in improving the article. This is fine. If you want to contribute to the article in any way at all, I'll be here to help however I can. I would ask you to please think carefully before adding a misleading assertion like "Einstein rejected black holes" (which doesn't tell the whole truth) or "black hole theory is unfalsifiable," because doing so would just hurt the article, misinform anyone who reads it and waste the time of any editor who feels like trying to fix it.
 +
 +
:::::::Meanwhile, I'm going to finish filling out the [[general theory of relativity]] article. If you find some aspect of ''that'' one that you want to argue about in the same way you've argued about this article … well, don't bother. I've grown weary of the endless, pointless, going-nowhere talk, and I'm going to focus on making constructive contributions until I get bored of it, or I run out of useful things to add. You're obviously free to take those contributions and use them as you will, or throw them in the trash. It really doesn't matter to me one way or the other.
 +
 +
:::::::And finally, as to whether "this is a site where logic prevails," I've always been an actions-speak-louder-than-words sort of girl. The article is here; I have made my contribution to it. Whether logic (or for that matter, intellectual honesty) prevails is something I look forward to finding out. --[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 12:29, 13 November 2009 (EST)
85

edits

Navigation menu