Block
1,976
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 367:
Line 367: − :The rationale is simple: we can't prove for certain that he's a Muslim, so we have to insinuate it as best we can. The name stays. [[User:DonnyB|DonnyB]] 18:08, 13 November 2009 (EST)+
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 23:19, November 13, 2009
, 23:19, November 13, 2009Undo revision 719871 by DonnyB (Talk)
I imagine this debate has occurred before though. Is there any editorial rationale for including Obama's middle name in the banner, but not other presidents? [[User:Montecristo|Montecristo]] 11:34, 9 November 2009 (EST)
I imagine this debate has occurred before though. Is there any editorial rationale for including Obama's middle name in the banner, but not other presidents? [[User:Montecristo|Montecristo]] 11:34, 9 November 2009 (EST)
::It's difficult to prove anything when you're fighting a cover up created by the "President". Of course there's no total proof, but there is plenty of evidence. If you looked at the actual page, that would become quite evident to even a closed-minded liberal. But the original point made up top actually shows that we should keep the middle name, as "Hussein", like "Harrison" is generally known. [[User:MichaelZ|MichaelZ]] 18:19, 13 November 2009 (EST)
::It's difficult to prove anything when you're fighting a cover up created by the "President". Of course there's no total proof, but there is plenty of evidence. If you looked at the actual page, that would become quite evident to even a closed-minded liberal. But the original point made up top actually shows that we should keep the middle name, as "Hussein", like "Harrison" is generally known. [[User:MichaelZ|MichaelZ]] 18:19, 13 November 2009 (EST)