85
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,109:
Line 1,109: + + + +
Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)
Revision as of 23:43, November 13, 2009
, 23:43, November 13, 2009→Comments on Newtonian Mechanics
It seems like the article is defending an incorrect prediction by arguing that the predicted value is still up for debate. But this is wrong; we know what the predicted value was, and should honestly accept that it does not match observation.--[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]]
It seems like the article is defending an incorrect prediction by arguing that the predicted value is still up for debate. But this is wrong; we know what the predicted value was, and should honestly accept that it does not match observation.--[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]]
:Thanks for taking the time to find two specific areas for improvement here. This article was first on my list of those to improve — i.e., repair — when I signed up, but I've been working my way up to it because it's just so daunting. You've put the spotlight on a couple specific points, and that really helps.
:I'm in the middle of expanding [[general theory of relativity]] and won't finish it until tomorrow. Would you be interested in collaborating with me on this article? I think moving much of the detail of the special and general theories to their respective pages will help clear out some of the junk on this page. --[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 18:43, 13 November 2009 (EST)