17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
Talk:Sedition Act of 1918 (view source)
Revision as of 16:44, November 14, 2009
, 16:44, November 14, 2009explain
What would be the best way to reference the Sedition Act of 1798 here as well? Should we have this one page speaking of both (like I did at [[Missouri v. Jenkins]]), or should we have the Sedition Act of 1798 at [[Alien and Sedition Acts]]? Or should we have two separate pages for '''Sedition Act of 1918''' and '''Sedition Act of 1798''' and have this be a disambiguation? If the second, should we have a "See also" link at the top of this page like Wikipedia does? --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 22:27, 13 November 2009 (EST)
What would be the best way to reference the Sedition Act of 1798 here as well? Should we have this one page speaking of both (like I did at [[Missouri v. Jenkins]]), or should we have the Sedition Act of 1798 at [[Alien and Sedition Acts]]? Or should we have two separate pages for '''Sedition Act of 1918''' and '''Sedition Act of 1798''' and have this be a disambiguation? If the second, should we have a "See also" link at the top of this page like Wikipedia does? --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 22:27, 13 November 2009 (EST)
:Good question. This page will be moved to Sedition Act of 1918 and "Sedition Act" will be turned into a disambiguation page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 02:34, 14 November 2009 (EST)
:Good question. This page will be moved to Sedition Act of 1918 and "Sedition Act" will be turned into a disambiguation page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 02:34, 14 November 2009 (EST)
::conservatives strongly oppose sedition in wartime and hsave historically supported these laws--which have been upheld by the Supreme Court.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 11:44, 14 November 2009 (EST)