Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Then, please, pause for a moment and ask yourself: why didn't they tell you this so you could decide for yourself, rather than being told what to think?
Line 6: Line 6:     
::Okay. Let's find a way of making that point without quoting an incorrect value for the Mercury anomaly then? Cause putting in a number that's not actually supported by observations just to make a philosophical point seems kind of … I dunno. Deceptive? --[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 17:58, 14 November 2009 (EST)
 
::Okay. Let's find a way of making that point without quoting an incorrect value for the Mercury anomaly then? Cause putting in a number that's not actually supported by observations just to make a philosophical point seems kind of … I dunno. Deceptive? --[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 17:58, 14 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::Kate, if I can call you that, I have no reason to lie about this.  I'm not applying for any grants.  I'm trying to get a PhD from liberal professors.  I'm not worried about what my colleagues might say.  Like the Bible, I'm just telling the truth, and trying to learn more of it.
 +
 +
:::The physics journals all seem to require payment for access.  But type this into a Google search:  5599.7 Mercury.  You'll then see what the liberal physics professors won't tell you, as Google returns fragments from limited-access journals.  Then, please, pause for a moment and ask yourself:  why didn't they tell you this so you could decide for yourself, rather than being told what to think?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:40, 14 November 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Navigation menu