Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
due to advances in precision in measurement, the prediction of relativity no longer matches the data on the precession.
Line 26: Line 26:     
::::Would you be a dear and remove the incorrect anomaly figure from your essay now? I know it's a work in progress and I hate nitpickers, but somebody could stumble across that and be misinformed.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 19:11, 14 November 2009 (EST)
 
::::Would you be a dear and remove the incorrect anomaly figure from your essay now? I know it's a work in progress and I hate nitpickers, but somebody could stumble across that and be misinformed.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 19:11, 14 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::Your point is an excellent one.  Thank you.  The 30% figure was wrong for the reasons you provide.
 +
 +
:::::But the underlying point in this entry remains correct:  due to advances in precision in measurement, the prediction of relativity no longer matches the data on the precession.  The discrepancy is much greater than the margin of error, which is all that matters from a logical perspective.  The entry has been updated accordingly, and I welcome further comments you may have.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:44, 14 November 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Navigation menu