Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 65: Line 65:  
There was no suspense about the outcome earlier Friday in the House, since the Democrats hold a 255-to-178 advantage in the chamber.
 
There was no suspense about the outcome earlier Friday in the House, since the Democrats hold a 255-to-178 advantage in the chamber.
    +
==Impact==
 +
[[File:Varvel-09-11-16.jpg|thumb|300px|Cartoonist Gary Varvel ridicules the liberal argument]]
 +
Unemployment climbed steadily month by month after the stimulus became law in February, reaching 10.2% in October 2009.  Liberals said not enough money had been spent fast enough, and indeed the Obama Administration was very slow in getting the money spent.
 
==Non Essential items==
 
==Non Essential items==
−
The people in charge of spending tax dollars are set to spend like never before and special interest groups are poised to be the recipients. House Minority whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., told the media Wednesday, “This was not a stimulus bill. It was a spending bill.” <ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Stimulus_Democrats_GOP/2009/01/29/176427.html GOP Resisted as Stimulus Veered Off Target] NewsMax, January 29, 2009</ref>
+
Conservatives, represented by House Minority whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., complained, “This was not a stimulus bill. It was a spending bill.” <ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Stimulus_Democrats_GOP/2009/01/29/176427.html GOP Resisted as Stimulus Veered Off Target] NewsMax, January 29, 2009</ref>
    
Some of the "stimulus" proposals attacked by conservatives:
 
Some of the "stimulus" proposals attacked by conservatives:
Line 107: Line 110:  
* $200 million for new contraceptive service
 
* $200 million for new contraceptive service
 
* $20 million to renovate the National Mall
 
* $20 million to renovate the National Mall
−
  −
      
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
17,394

edits

Navigation menu