461
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
→Locked
Hold up for a bit while we sort out what to do, Jack. We already have separate articles on the Obama Czars, and were planning on consolidating them, and this space was being used as a redirect page, and really shouldn't have been used for this name. News at eleven! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 09:44, 20 August 2009 (EDT)
Hold up for a bit while we sort out what to do, Jack. We already have separate articles on the Obama Czars, and were planning on consolidating them, and this space was being used as a redirect page, and really shouldn't have been used for this name. News at eleven! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 09:44, 20 August 2009 (EDT)
:It's not clear that it will, but if this page continues to exist, it should note that "czar" is not and never has been the official title of anyone in the executive branch of the U.S. government. The term is basically media shorthand used--since at least the Nixon Administration--to designate executive-brach officials with authority or expertise in some aspect of policy but no Cabinet post. This means that there is no way to state authoritatively that the Obama Administration has ''x'' number of czars. [[User:ChrisFV|ChrisFV]] 13:59, 20 November 2009 (EST)