Thought this may be note worthy for an editor, though its depth and impact may be questioned :
+
Working on other stuff myself, but thought this may be note worthy for an editor, though its depth and impact is yet to be ascertained:
−
[http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/hackers-prove-global-warming-is-scam.html ''Hackers Prove Global Warming Is A Scam'']
+
[http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/hackers-prove-global-warming-is-scam.html ''Hackers Prove Global Warming Is A Scam'']
+
+
"One particular thing you said - and we agreed - was about the IPCC reports and the broader climate negotiations were working to the globalisation agenda driven by organisations like the WTO."
+
+
Also Vox Day opinion, [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2009/09/agw-biggest-science-fraud-yet.html ''AGW: the biggest science fraud yet''][[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 09:39, 21 November 2009 (EST)