Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:  
:Regardless of whether a bat is a bird, God may have simply wanted people not to eat them because of something they had in common with birds - perhaps flight or a diet of insects exposes them to some disease that non-flying birds don't have, I don't know.   
 
:Regardless of whether a bat is a bird, God may have simply wanted people not to eat them because of something they had in common with birds - perhaps flight or a diet of insects exposes them to some disease that non-flying birds don't have, I don't know.   
 
:We should not ever be attempting to tear down the Bible with knowledge that we've gained through genetics or other modern science (like ostriches having more in common with birds than bats), but instead use the Bible to understand our world better, and using modern knowledge as a supplement to that.  I pray you learn to stop trying to tear down the Bible. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 13:51, 21 November 2009 (EST)
 
:We should not ever be attempting to tear down the Bible with knowledge that we've gained through genetics or other modern science (like ostriches having more in common with birds than bats), but instead use the Bible to understand our world better, and using modern knowledge as a supplement to that.  I pray you learn to stop trying to tear down the Bible. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 13:51, 21 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:: Look no further than our own article, [[Bible scientific foreknowledge]].  However, I must concur with Jacob: Daniel, your writing is roundabout that I can barely read it.  Conciseness is key. To the point, baraminology is a fledgling but burgeoning field of research, with extraordinary predictive power.  I suggest you research it more before presenting paltry criticism. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 14:14, 21 November 2009 (EST)
    
== 3:14 ==
 
== 3:14 ==
Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, oversight, Administrators
2,260

edits

Navigation menu