122
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 195:
Line 195: + + +
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Order (view source)
Revision as of 12:49, November 22, 2009
, 12:49, November 22, 2009→Information theory?
::: To be candid, Stitch, if one's mind is completely made up and closed with respect to relativity, then I'm not optimistic about how insightful one can be on other topics. The essence of advancing knowledge is an open mind that is constantly challenging existing theories. That's what we do here, and I hope you can accept that approach.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:33, 21 November 2009 (EST)
::: To be candid, Stitch, if one's mind is completely made up and closed with respect to relativity, then I'm not optimistic about how insightful one can be on other topics. The essence of advancing knowledge is an open mind that is constantly challenging existing theories. That's what we do here, and I hope you can accept that approach.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:33, 21 November 2009 (EST)
:::: As all most physicist in the world, i am expecting what the next LIGO upgrade will bring. If it does not show gravity wave events then the colleagues in the relativity community may have to explain sth to us, since the general claim would be that it should be possible to observe these events then. However I am not an expert on relativity, so this is not my bussiness. And i find it sad that you suppose that somebody doing actual experiments and evaluating the data himself can tell less about modern physics than somebody who has comparatively little personal experience in experimental physics, and negligible one in theoretical physics. I am used to judge people based on what their statements and not on their non-statements. --[[User:Stitch75|Stitch75]] 07:49, 22 November 2009 (EST)