9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
→Let me get this straight
You removed something, were banned for it, the ban was reconsidered, but you go and remove it again? Even in removing your block, Karajou implied it was not a positive change to the article. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:11, 19 November 2009 (EST)
You removed something, were banned for it, the ban was reconsidered, but you go and remove it again? Even in removing your block, Karajou implied it was not a positive change to the article. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:11, 19 November 2009 (EST)
The "So-called" was not needed for the following reason. Even though the original poster may not agree with the teachings of the Enlightenment, it was still none the less a philosophical movement which the original poster seemed to acknowledge by cap the word. Wasn't the idea of setting up Conservapedia an answer to move away from liberal bias? Then why are we setting up the mirror image of Wikipedia? Posts should contain truth, without pressing the personal opinion of the poster.