55
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + +
response
In their campaign against the white leaders in America, the reds are careful to point out that this does not apply to the white leaders of Russia and their counterparts in America. This creates the illusion that the white communists are different; that they are the friends and champions of the Negroes. This is the same sucker bait the reds used to win and use millions of white peoples now under the whiplash of Soviet tyranny. They took the Soviet road to freedom only to find it a snare and a delusion.</blockquote>[[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 07:37, 22 November 2009 (EST)
In their campaign against the white leaders in America, the reds are careful to point out that this does not apply to the white leaders of Russia and their counterparts in America. This creates the illusion that the white communists are different; that they are the friends and champions of the Negroes. This is the same sucker bait the reds used to win and use millions of white peoples now under the whiplash of Soviet tyranny. They took the Soviet road to freedom only to find it a snare and a delusion.</blockquote>[[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 07:37, 22 November 2009 (EST)
Ok, we agree to disagree. I just felt with so many good and important things that he accomplished that the article, while reflecting the Communism, still point out the positive things too. Innocent people as well as communists died under Pinochet yet he warrants a much more positive article than Robeson whom I think most would agree did much for the US before Marxist indoctrination. His life could perhaps serve as a lesson to interested younger people but it has to be his life not just to Communistic aspects of it.[[User:AmandaC|AmandaC]] 03:08, 23 November 2009 (EST)