1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + +
Conservapedia talk:Request Unprotection (view source)
Revision as of 13:52, March 29, 2007
, 13:52, March 29, 2007→Organization of the page
*You are way too fast for me, Ed! I was just about to message you and suggest Sysop's use the Project Page. If the supplicant posts on the page of the locking Sysop, and isn't responded to there, we could use the Project page to note actions taken. I can't imagine more than one or two Sysop's not responding to a request, pro or con. Those that do not, well, they abdicate their right to decide, IMO.... --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 09:49, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
*You are way too fast for me, Ed! I was just about to message you and suggest Sysop's use the Project Page. If the supplicant posts on the page of the locking Sysop, and isn't responded to there, we could use the Project page to note actions taken. I can't imagine more than one or two Sysop's not responding to a request, pro or con. Those that do not, well, they abdicate their right to decide, IMO.... --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 09:49, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
::What are we counting as a response, BTW? A simple 'no, get lost' would hardly seem sufficient. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 09:52, 29 March 2007 (EDT)