Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 89: Line 89:  
::::The "point" is that Wikipedians (liberal wannabee scientists) won't state which theory is contradicted by the data.  You're just guessing when you say "Newton and relativity."
 
::::The "point" is that Wikipedians (liberal wannabee scientists) won't state which theory is contradicted by the data.  You're just guessing when you say "Newton and relativity."
   −
::::This is like the feminists who won't use certain words, like "girl" or "gentlemanly".  If confronted with a situation where no substitute works, a feminist will still find a way not say the "forbidden" word.  They'll congratulate a new mother on her baby girl by calling her a "baby woman"!
+
::::This is like the feminists who won't use certain words, like "girl" or "gentlemanly".  If confronted with a situation where no substitute works, a feminist will still find a way not to say the "forbidden" word.  They'll congratulate a new mother on her baby girl by calling her a "baby woman"!
    
::::Try saying expressly on Wikipedia that the theory of relativity is contradicted by the Pioneer data and watch that be erased by its liberal editors.  Do you think that is science, or logic?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:32, 25 November 2009 (EST)
 
::::Try saying expressly on Wikipedia that the theory of relativity is contradicted by the Pioneer data and watch that be erased by its liberal editors.  Do you think that is science, or logic?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:32, 25 November 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Navigation menu