Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + +
The real objection is probably not that this entry is ineffective, but that it is highly effective in educating visitors about liberal deceit. Don't worry, liberals can still feign surprise when a ne
:: I don't think he was objecting to exposing deceit, he was just pointing out that compiling a huge page of it makes it seem as if this website is just a huge, rambling, attack on liberals as opposed to an informative and useful resource. I fully agree that exposing the deceit is important, but it would be better done by moving the information from this page to all the pages that are specifically affected--[[User:JacobX|JacobX]] 10:52, 26 November 2009 (EST)
:: I don't think he was objecting to exposing deceit, he was just pointing out that compiling a huge page of it makes it seem as if this website is just a huge, rambling, attack on liberals as opposed to an informative and useful resource. I fully agree that exposing the deceit is important, but it would be better done by moving the information from this page to all the pages that are specifically affected--[[User:JacobX|JacobX]] 10:52, 26 November 2009 (EST)
:::There's no logic to the objection. It obviously is useful to see a collection of various examples of [[deceit]] in one place. The real objection is probably not that this entry is ineffective, but that it is highly effective in educating visitors about liberal deceit. Don't worry, liberals can still feign surprise when a new example is exposed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:17, 26 November 2009 (EST)
==10 Commandments==
==10 Commandments==