Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 799:
Line 799: + +
→Eden: The serpent and God: You make interesting and provocative points. I have an open-mind about it, and will consider further. Thanks.
::I see no overstatement by the serpent. The serpent's prediction precisely matches God's later assessment. Whether this "becoming as gods" actually corresponds to the common view of God is debatable, of course, but since the serpent qualifies its "be as gods" statement, man probably was to become as gods in this regard only - without obtaining omniscience or omnipotence. Anyway, I find the reference to John a little dubious when Genesis is the primary source for events in Eden. [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 23:38, 27 November 2009 (EST)
::I see no overstatement by the serpent. The serpent's prediction precisely matches God's later assessment. Whether this "becoming as gods" actually corresponds to the common view of God is debatable, of course, but since the serpent qualifies its "be as gods" statement, man probably was to become as gods in this regard only - without obtaining omniscience or omnipotence. Anyway, I find the reference to John a little dubious when Genesis is the primary source for events in Eden. [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 23:38, 27 November 2009 (EST)
:::You make interesting and provocative points. I have an open-mind about it, and will consider further. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:59, 27 November 2009 (EST)