Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
235 bytes added ,  20:32, November 28, 2009
There are six states that lack a right to keep and bear arms (RKBA) in their state constitutions, and these states have the most to gain from incorporation of the Second Amendment against the states.
Line 14: Line 14:     
The case, as presented before the Supreme Court, relies on two main arguments: that the [[Second Amendment]] is incorporated into state law by the [[Fourteenth Amendment]], and that the second amendment invalidates one or all of the provisions of Chicago laws affecting the petitioners.  Should the Court rule in the petitioners' favor, a number of weapon bans and registration laws across the country will be overturned.
 
The case, as presented before the Supreme Court, relies on two main arguments: that the [[Second Amendment]] is incorporated into state law by the [[Fourteenth Amendment]], and that the second amendment invalidates one or all of the provisions of Chicago laws affecting the petitioners.  Should the Court rule in the petitioners' favor, a number of weapon bans and registration laws across the country will be overturned.
 +
 +
There are six states that lack a right to keep and bear arms (RKBA) in their state constitutions, and these states have the most to gain from incorporation of the Second Amendment against the states.  Maryland is one of those states.
    
==References==
 
==References==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,529

edits

Navigation menu