115
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Relativity and MemeShock: new section
Please be aware of our [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines#Assistants Guidelines] regarding blocking. Non-Administrators should not be blocking for reasons of policy, or subjective reasons such as user name, unless such name is blatantly obscene. Communications from blocked users should be passed on to one of the Admins as well. Thanks. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:51, 28 November 2009 (EST)
Please be aware of our [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines#Assistants Guidelines] regarding blocking. Non-Administrators should not be blocking for reasons of policy, or subjective reasons such as user name, unless such name is blatantly obscene. Communications from blocked users should be passed on to one of the Admins as well. Thanks. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:51, 28 November 2009 (EST)
== Relativity and MemeShock ==
Jacob:
"You continue to address the same points over and over in your objections to Conservapedia's content on relativity,"
"just to bait other editors into responding to you - a classic internet troll."
No, I'm having a debate with Andy. You can read my posts they are not rude. I am merely trying to explain to him why the stuff he has there is wrong. Let me show you something. The page contradicts itself:
In one section it argues that relativity lacks evidence:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Relativity#Lack_of_evidence_for_Relativity
In the very next section it gives evidence for relativity!:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Relativity#Time_dilation
You can't tell me this is unreasonable debate.
P.S. And I have not suggested any changes to the page and/or tried to change the page after you lifted the block.
"and, by your own admission, try to use Conservapedia to push your agenda and your preferred vocabulary."
Yes, that was meant to be a contribution to Conservapedia. Here, I've greatly contributed to your new conservative words page and created stubs for many of these: http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words
Look at the links above in about MemeShock in the talk section on my page. I think you'll like what I have to offer.
"Please contribute constructively and stop violating 90/10 on the relativity pages."
I'm sorry I got distracted with the relativity page. I originally came here to add to the conservative lexicon -which I figured would be appreciated. I got sidetracked with the relativity page because I happen to be a physics major and couldn't help but object to what I was seeing.
I intend to produce a number of pages on different topics and edit pages in a way you would find constructive. Don't I'm not a troll.
P.S. Tell me what you think of the MemeShock program on facebook. I hope you will find that useful.
[[user:jfraatz|Johanan Raatz]]