Automoderated users, edit
3,552
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + + + + +
Talk:Milky Way Galaxy (view source)
Revision as of 19:09, November 29, 2009
, 19:09, November 29, 2009→Edit Warring on Age: new section
::::The answer to your question TrondE is twofold: First, there is no evidence of the beliefs of the scientists who wrote the paper in regards to the age of the Milky Way, therefore it is an assumption. Second even if we knew what beliefs they hold, it is irrelevant to the section and article at hand. I mean, at that point, why not mention the belief of every other person I mention in the article? The answer is obvious. It be silly and pointless. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 11:41, 27 November 2009 (EST)
::::The answer to your question TrondE is twofold: First, there is no evidence of the beliefs of the scientists who wrote the paper in regards to the age of the Milky Way, therefore it is an assumption. Second even if we knew what beliefs they hold, it is irrelevant to the section and article at hand. I mean, at that point, why not mention the belief of every other person I mention in the article? The answer is obvious. It be silly and pointless. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 11:41, 27 November 2009 (EST)
== Edit Warring on Age ==
I'm changing it back because as it was, it says, "This is what's true. But Creationists believe something else." Now it says "Non-creationists believe this. Creationists believe this other thing. Debate continues."
I've removed the passage marking atheists as such that you see to object to so much, describing them as "Non-creationists." If you want to change something, feel free, but please don't change it so that it says one view is true.[[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 14:09, 29 November 2009 (EST)