Changes

Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)

Revision as of 20:52, November 29, 2009

553 bytes added , 20:52, November 29, 2009

This suggestion falls into the same category as opinions by J. Robert Oppenheimer on when to use the atom bomb. He wasn't an expert on war or foreign relations, so his opinion on use was irrelevant.

Line 1: Line 1: −

'''Attention: Please review previous points on the discussion page before adding your own commentary. Many topics have been discussed many, many, times. If you have something new to add, feel free, but it is not necessary or helpful to read the same arguments over and over and over.'''

Line 420: Line 419:

Evan, please read the top of this page. It is made clear that bringing up old points isn't helpful, and you'll find this point at [[Talk:Theory_of_relativity/Archive_1#Moral_Relativism_line_needs_to_go.]] Any questions you have about this subject can be answered there. Check the archives before posting. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 15:48, 29 November 2009 (EST)

+

::::Jacob's point is well-taken. That said, I will respond to Evan. Einstein's opinion on physics is relevant, but I don't see the significance of his opinions on religion, politics, philosophy, education or the media. Einstein was not an expert in American politics, for example. This suggestion falls into the same category as opinions by [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] on when to use the atom bomb. He wasn't an expert on war or foreign relations, so his opinion on use was irrelevant.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:52, 29 November 2009 (EST)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,596

edits