Changes

I cannot speak for Raatz, but I myself do read the bible, and the only contributions I have made to this project are attempted edits to relativity.  The reason is that I am a physicist, and felt that my contributions would best be made in this specialized area.  Conservapedia appears to have many knowledgeable of the bible, but few physicists.  Not making bible related edits is not evidence of not reading the bible- it could be evidence of finding the current articles satisfactory.  As a physicist, I find this relativity article simply embarrassing, and hence the endeavor to improve it.  I encourage you, Andy, to take your famously open mind and sit down with a good introduction to the theory, and work through some standard introductory problems.  I think that actually learning what you try to criticize may help greatly. --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 16:06, 29 November 2009 (EST)

I cannot speak for Raatz, but I myself do read the bible, and the only contributions I have made to this project are attempted edits to relativity.  The reason is that I am a physicist, and felt that my contributions would best be made in this specialized area.  Conservapedia appears to have many knowledgeable of the bible, but few physicists.  Not making bible related edits is not evidence of not reading the bible- it could be evidence of finding the current articles satisfactory.  As a physicist, I find this relativity article simply embarrassing, and hence the endeavor to improve it.  I encourage you, Andy, to take your famously open mind and sit down with a good introduction to the theory, and work through some standard introductory problems.  I think that actually learning what you try to criticize may help greatly. --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 16:06, 29 November 2009 (EST)

== A Word on Relativism ==

== A Word on Relativism ==