740
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 218:
Line 218: + +
→Reversion Anticipated: Could you explain why?
::::: I only changed the intro, which does not contain your phrase, but there are structural (intended?) theoretical barriers to testing claims about what is inside a black hole. It's speculation ''ad nauseum''.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:00, 1 December 2009 (EST)
::::: I only changed the intro, which does not contain your phrase, but there are structural (intended?) theoretical barriers to testing claims about what is inside a black hole. It's speculation ''ad nauseum''.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:00, 1 December 2009 (EST)
::::::Andy, would you mind explaining why it's "excuses" to explain why black holes are non-falsifiable? If you have a better explanation, I'd appreciate if you could add it. Right now, the article just states it without proof, leaving any readers wondering. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 10:02, 1 December 2009 (EST)