284
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 74:
Line 74: + + +
→"overturned on appeal": still don't see relevancy to this article
:That would be faulty logic, Yoritomo. The Pardons merely corrected a wrong, inasmuch as the others were overturned. The correct logical conclusion is the others would have been overturned had they not already pleaded guilty, and the one party would not have been convicted had the reasoning of the appeals judge been applied. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small>/Admin</small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:40, 1 December 2009 (EST)
:That would be faulty logic, Yoritomo. The Pardons merely corrected a wrong, inasmuch as the others were overturned. The correct logical conclusion is the others would have been overturned had they not already pleaded guilty, and the one party would not have been convicted had the reasoning of the appeals judge been applied. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small>/Admin</small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:40, 1 December 2009 (EST)
::I still don't see why convictions in the US, overturned or not, are significant to the Nicaraguan Contras. How are the affair's legal repercussions in the US relevant to this article?
::Actually I'd suggest removing mention of Oliver North's current job as well, unless we want to insinuate that Fox News employs supporters of groups we mention under [[Terrorism#Right (Reactionary) Terrorism|Right Terrorism]] - and even if we wanted to insinuate that, I'd still say this article is not the one to make that point. [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 15:27, 1 December 2009 (EST)