24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 100:
Line 100: + +
→Too Much mention of religion
:A rather sensible idea. This should be on a policy page somewhere. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:02, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
:A rather sensible idea. This should be on a policy page somewhere. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:02, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Above, there's a comment, "We should allow contributors to cite arguments..." I wanted to point that comment out because I agree with it. What I think is being missed here, is that this article is not citing an argument, but engaging in one. There's a fundamental question here: should Conservapedia be a home to essays which attempt to argue points in order to draw their own conclusions? One other thing. This article is about one of the most important framers of the fundamental ideas that shaped the founding of the United States. It mentions the word "deist" or "deism" 12 times. I think that's a massive over-emphasis on his religion. I'm not saying we should remove those details, but consolidating and summarizing might make sense. It would certainly make the need for further detail on the rest of his life more apparent. -[[User:Harmil|Harmil]] 12:05, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>