Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
Talk:Evolution syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 15:37, December 3, 2009
, 15:37, December 3, 2009As to your fallacious argument that something must be true if it is considered better than an alternative, that argument does not work in mathematical proofs, it doesn't work in logic, and it doesn't
::::Since there's been no response, I have taken the iniative & changed the wording. I am assuming that the intended meaning is that sufferers of this "syndrome" insist that evolution itself is true, not only that they truly believe in it. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]]
::::Since there's been no response, I have taken the iniative & changed the wording. I am assuming that the intended meaning is that sufferers of this "syndrome" insist that evolution itself is true, not only that they truly believe in it. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]]
::::: Is there any evidence to support a theory counter to that of evolution? Yes - scientists do not suffer fools gladly (nor do most people). Insisting beliefs are true does not make them so. Theories need to make predictions that are verifiable. Can we get some reference for counter evolutionary evidence? This articles lacks any references at all. --[[User:Scasey|Scasey]] 10:27, 3 December 2009 (EST)
::::: Is there any evidence to support a theory counter to that of evolution? Yes - scientists do not suffer fools gladly (nor do most people). Insisting beliefs are true does not make them so. Theories need to make predictions that are verifiable. Can we get some reference for counter evolutionary evidence? This articles lacks any references at all. --[[User:Scasey|Scasey]] 10:27, 3 December 2009 (EST)
::::: See [[Counterexamples to evolution]]. As to your fallacious argument that something must be true if it is considered better than an alternative, that argument does not work in mathematical proofs, it doesn't work in logic, and it doesn't fool anyone here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:37, 3 December 2009 (EST)
==Most atheists to many atheists change==
==Most atheists to many atheists change==