209
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + + + + + + +
→No need to exaggerate: new section
And now, currently, if you do a [http://www.google.com/search?q=Climategate&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Google Search: Climategate] - despite 26,400,000 articles discussing the Climategate scandal, Google has restricted the search results to be limited to only 10 pages (9 actually, page 10 redirects to page 1). [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 18:48, 3 December 2009 (EST)
And now, currently, if you do a [http://www.google.com/search?q=Climategate&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Google Search: Climategate] - despite 26,400,000 articles discussing the Climategate scandal, Google has restricted the search results to be limited to only 10 pages (9 actually, page 10 redirects to page 1). [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 18:48, 3 December 2009 (EST)
:''Update'': I removed the portion from the [[Climategate|Climate Gate]] page referencing Google's search engine only showing ten pages worth of results. It seems the problem was 'fixed' in one way or another. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 19:59, 3 December 2009 (EST)
:''Update'': I removed the portion from the [[Climategate|Climate Gate]] page referencing Google's search engine only showing ten pages worth of results. It seems the problem was 'fixed' in one way or another. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 19:59, 3 December 2009 (EST)
== No need to exaggerate ==
I noticed this line in the article:
"In reality, the small 'fraction of research' is actually a worldwide scam to grab power and dictate new Leftist laws"
This seems rather dubious at best, since it involves an extreme extrapolation from one small group of people to many thousands spread throughout many research institutions across the globe. It is not logical to argue that because there are some serious issues with one group's research that there must therefore be similar issues with all other work of a similar nature (look up inductive reasoning). Just stick to the evidence available, which concerns only the site in East Anglia, there's no need to make extravagant claims. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 20:38, 3 December 2009 (EST)