17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 92:
Line 92: − ==Secrecy== − [[Conservatives]] and some [[liberals]] are alarmed at the level of secrecy which the Obama administration has evidenced, after promising an "unprecedented level of openness in government." <ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0721/p09s06-coop.html</ref><ref>http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/president-obama/white-house-wont-disclose-list-of-health-industry-visitors-but-promise-of-transparency-is-still-on-campaign-web-site/</ref><ref>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/4/7/717546/-More-Immunity-Claims-on-Wiretapping-from-Obama-DOJ</ref><ref>http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/07/white-house-wont-say-who-prepared-sotomayor.html</ref> − − Some critics see such secrecy less troubling than the extensive list of undisclosed or missing information about the President himself.<ref>http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100613 </ref> − − Conversely, the White house recently requested the public to report any "disinformation" about its proposed health plan. <ref> http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts-Are-Stubborn-Things/</ref><ref>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308048/posts?page=41#41</ref> Many conservatives see such as alarming, prompting a request by Texas Senator John Cornyn to cease its data collection.<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/08/cornyn_to_obama_stop_with_the.asp</ref>
→Secrecy: drop old stuff
<sub>-Barack Obama</sub>
<sub>-Barack Obama</sub>
==Senior Staff==
==Senior Staff==