Changes

:: Time to brush up on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].  This one is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Ad hominem].  As a follow-up, the action of a few individuals are not necessarily indicative of the industry as a whole.  You must supply the evidence that contradicts the predictions of the climate change models.  What evidence can you point to that refutes the predictions of global warming models?  Clearly, this discussion needs to move elsewhere.  --[[User:Scasey|Scasey]] 19:20, 3 December 2009 (EST)

:: Time to brush up on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].  This one is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Ad hominem].  As a follow-up, the action of a few individuals are not necessarily indicative of the industry as a whole.  You must supply the evidence that contradicts the predictions of the climate change models.  What evidence can you point to that refutes the predictions of global warming models?  Clearly, this discussion needs to move elsewhere.  --[[User:Scasey|Scasey]] 19:20, 3 December 2009 (EST)

:::The evidence is in those emails, as well as the documentation that those people at East Anglia are desperately trying to hide.  And why should I believe any climate change model that was created by such people?  From what I see here, you're trying to push their lies on this site.  Bye.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:31, 4 December 2009 (EST)

:::The evidence is in those emails, as well as the documentation that those people at East Anglia are desperately trying to hide.  And why should I believe any climate change model that was created by such people?  From what I see here, you're trying to push their lies on this site.  Bye.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:31, 4 December 2009 (EST)