142
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
no edit summary
::As there have been many edit wars in the past over the phrase to use, I really think a site-wide policy needs to be set on this. Of course "evolutionary scientists" is wrong but [[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] seems to disagree. Maybe it should be brought up on [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s page. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 12:33, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
::As there have been many edit wars in the past over the phrase to use, I really think a site-wide policy needs to be set on this. Of course "evolutionary scientists" is wrong but [[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] seems to disagree. Maybe it should be brought up on [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s page. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 12:33, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Andy doesn't care, and if he does, he will care in the wrong direction. We shall fight them on the stub pages. We shall fight them on the template pages. We shall fight them on the debate pages. But we shall not fight them on Andy's page.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:36, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Andy doesn't care, and if he does, he will care in the wrong direction. We shall fight them on the stub pages. We shall fight them on the template pages. We shall fight them on the debate pages. But we shall not fight them on Andy's page.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:36, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
::::I guess you're right, it probably wouldn't come to anything, though I still think it's better to have clear policies, whatever the direction they go in, rather than edit wars --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 12:43, 29 March 2007 (EDT)