1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
The anonymous comment is wrong on every count
:::::Sure, the standard model needs extended. So did Newtonian mechanics and SR. It's still rock solid in its domain of application. The part about lack of experimental verification is about as wrong as it could be; basically every particle physics experiment involving hadrons generates vast quantities of data supporting the quark model. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:24, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::Sure, the standard model needs extended. So did Newtonian mechanics and SR. It's still rock solid in its domain of application. The part about lack of experimental verification is about as wrong as it could be; basically every particle physics experiment involving hadrons generates vast quantities of data supporting the quark model. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:24, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::: The anonymous comment is wrong on every count. QCD is renormalizable. Bible quotes about quarks would have no effect on the Discovery Institute. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:58, 29 March 2007 (EDT)