Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
36 bytes added ,  03:26, December 7, 2009
Several possible explanations, some flawed, have been proposed this effect:
Line 15: Line 15:  
Originally, scientists supposed that the Pioneer navigation code was in error.  However, the code was verified by an independent team.  After a rigorous search for all possible effects, the anomaly was determined to be real:  the course actually does diverge from models.<ref name="Nieto" />
 
Originally, scientists supposed that the Pioneer navigation code was in error.  However, the code was verified by an independent team.  After a rigorous search for all possible effects, the anomaly was determined to be real:  the course actually does diverge from models.<ref name="Nieto" />
   −
There are many possible explanations for the effect.
+
Several possible explanations, some flawed, have been proposed this effect:
   −
* The anomalous acceleration could be due to the spacecraft venting energy in certain directions.<ref>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/04/13/pioneer-spacecraft-a-step-closer-to-being-boring/</ref>. However, such effects would be expected to be more significant earlier on, when the power sources were less degraded<ref name="Nieto" />. The opposite was actually the case.
+
* The anomalous acceleration could be due to the spacecraft venting energy in certain directions.<ref>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/04/13/pioneer-spacecraft-a-step-closer-to-being-boring/</ref>  However, such effects would be expected to be more significant earlier on, when the power sources were less degraded.<ref name="Nieto" />  The opposite was actually the case.
 
* The theory of [[General Relativity]] and the [[Law of Universal Gravitation]] could be wrong; the gravitational force could be slightly stronger than predicted.  In this context, it is important to note that other spacecraft flying in hyperbolic trajectories around celestial bodies have also experienced anomalous gravitational effects.
 
* The theory of [[General Relativity]] and the [[Law of Universal Gravitation]] could be wrong; the gravitational force could be slightly stronger than predicted.  In this context, it is important to note that other spacecraft flying in hyperbolic trajectories around celestial bodies have also experienced anomalous gravitational effects.
−
* There could be gravitational forces from other celestial bodies that have not been taken into account.  Dr. [[Russell Humphreys]] has explained<ref name="Humphreys">Russell Humphreys.  "[http://creation.com/images/journal_of_creation/vol21/5181creationist.pdf Creationist cosmologies explain the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer spacecraft]."  ''Journal of Creation'', August 2007.</ref> the Pioneer Anomaly as part of [[Starlight_problem#Humphreys.27_model|his new cosmology]], as the pull from the center of mass of the universe, which he locates inside the [[solar system]].  However, he does not explain why this gravitational force does not influence the motion of the planets.
+
* There could be gravitational forces from other celestial bodies that have not been taken into account.  Dr. [[Russell Humphreys]] has proposed an explanation<ref name="Humphreys">Russell Humphreys.  "[http://creation.com/images/journal_of_creation/vol21/5181creationist.pdf Creationist cosmologies explain the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer spacecraft]."  ''Journal of Creation'', August 2007.</ref> the Pioneer anomaly as part of [[Starlight_problem#Humphreys.27_model|his new cosmology]], as the pull from the center of mass of the universe, which he locates inside the [[solar system]].  However, he does not explain why this gravitational force does not influence the motion of the planets.
    
==References==
 
==References==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,304

edits

Navigation menu