13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 19:
Line 19: + + + + + + +
I thought it nescessary to introduce the controversy due to liberal activists and politicians wanting just renewable eneryg vs. cooperation and competition.
Nuclear fusion has been sought vigorously as a clean energy source, but the end result in every try has been less energy resulting in the reaction than was put into it. Nevertheless, several countries still invest heavily in nuclear fusion energy programs in the hope that someday they may become viable.
Nuclear fusion has been sought vigorously as a clean energy source, but the end result in every try has been less energy resulting in the reaction than was put into it. Nevertheless, several countries still invest heavily in nuclear fusion energy programs in the hope that someday they may become viable.
==Controversy==
An environmentalist wants two things when it comes to generating electricity...
1. CO^2 Emissions Free
2. Efficiency
So Nuclear energy is not only competitive with coal energy, but by an environmentalists standards, "cleaner." So why then, do "environmentalists" who claim they are for these two goals want America to just have inefficient solar panels and wind turbines, but have little problem with Iran, the country with arguably the most oil, obtaining nuclear power? The answer is because of a leftist agenda. They want to pass [[cap and trade]] which limits green house gas emissions. In short, it is a massive energy tax<ref>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124588837560750781.html</ref>. For those who still buy into the anthropogenic global warming lies, this is a dream come true. The bottom line controversy is this: Environmentalists claim that they want the cleanest, most efficient energy source, but despise domestic nuclear energy use while at the same time ardently support Iran obtaining nuclear energy. This negates any validity they had towards nuclear energy being unsafe. H.R. 391 <ref>http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h391/show</ref> would amend the Clean Air Act of 1963 <ref>http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/</ref> to not allow congress to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. This would make the energy industry more competitive. As all free market economists know, the product of competition is lower prices at better quality, ultimately benefiting the American people the most.
A nuclear fusion reactor was a central part of the 2004 film [[Spiderman 2]].
A nuclear fusion reactor was a central part of the 2004 film [[Spiderman 2]].