Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
True, so fix it.
Boy, the scienc material is sure lightweight stuff in this 'encyclopedia'. Beyond the expected fruitloop creation theories, the other material is mostly devoid of context, definition, and computational information. Go to Wikipedia if you want something worthwhile.
Boy, the scienc material is sure lightweight stuff in this 'encyclopedia'. Beyond the expected fruitloop creation theories, the other material is mostly devoid of context, definition, and computational information. Go to Wikipedia if you want something worthwhile.
:It has barely begun, and most of the work was done by schoolchildren. A lot of time has been wasted by dealing with sabotage.
:Please contribute a lot of scientific articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:21, 29 March 2007 (EDT)