Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 232:
Line 232: + + + + + +
Talk:Operation Iraqi Freedom (view source)
Revision as of 18:23, March 29, 2007
, 18:23, March 29, 2007→No Casus Belli?: There are various views on this
Is there some REASON we're not supposed to talk about how President Bush led us into war in Iraq?
Is there some REASON we're not supposed to talk about how President Bush led us into war in Iraq?
----
----
:We should talk about it. But edits like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Iraq_War&curid=8014&diff=72839&oldid=72151&rcid=75431 this] belong on the talk page - not in the body of the article.
:When there are opposing views, shall we just enshrine one as The Truth? That will degrade trust, and that's the weakness of Wikipedia. It (1) says it won't take sides but (2) routinely takes sides.
:I suggest we here acknowledge the existence of opposing views. It's ridiculously easy to detect them, when they are dimetrically opposed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:23, 29 March 2007 (EDT)