20
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + +
Debate:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation? (view source)
Revision as of 15:56, December 10, 2009
, 15:56, December 10, 2009no edit summary
No, I don't believe so. I am a liberal, and I do not hate her. I agree with '''what she says about objectivism'''. I do not necessarily agree with others interpretation of her words. If we pay attention to ourselves and do not mess with the lives of others, we cannot hurt others. Everyone has an equal opportunity if everything relies on one's skill and determination. There are no poor if we all have a chance. No employers, no interference, nothing to keep people from reaching their full potential. This is something that does not change easily, and will not change until the world becomes the ideal and suggesting it is redundant.
No, I don't believe so. I am a liberal, and I do not hate her. I agree with '''what she says about objectivism'''. I do not necessarily agree with others interpretation of her words. If we pay attention to ourselves and do not mess with the lives of others, we cannot hurt others. Everyone has an equal opportunity if everything relies on one's skill and determination. There are no poor if we all have a chance. No employers, no interference, nothing to keep people from reaching their full potential. This is something that does not change easily, and will not change until the world becomes the ideal and suggesting it is redundant.
[[User:LiberalStephanieO]]
[[User:LiberalStephanieO]]
With out the poor there is no scale by which to judge the wealthy. With no negative there is no positive. Polarization makes the world go round. Conservative need Liberals and Liberals need Conservatives. Though I don't understand why religion (specifically christianity) is so necessary in Conservative belief. Ayn Rand was an Atheist.