Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 4:
Line 4: − == Newton's theories derived from biblical study? == − − Given that this encyclopedia is in response to wikipedia's biases, I must mention that citing the Newton Claim with wikipedia's article and an unfounded and uncited claim is a tool of severe bias. I will remove it until further notice.
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:02, December 11, 2009
, 02:02, December 11, 2009Reverted edits by Cjodaly (Talk) to last version by MichaelZ
<!-- ===============Archive below this line! Do not remove anything above this line.=========================== -->
<!-- ===============Archive below this line! Do not remove anything above this line.=========================== -->
== Validity of claims of Evolution page bias ==
== Validity of claims of Evolution page bias ==