Changes

::*Conservapedia is not an academic reference source.  It is only a codex for a specific value set.

::*Conservapedia is not an academic reference source.  It is only a codex for a specific value set.

::Prosaic style not harmonize with your editorial prerogative.  I understand that and admit I would be a poor Conservapedia contribitor.  However, your site and your interview on The Colbert Report prove that you are personally an intelligent man and believe your readers are intelligent as well.  I think there is room in this world for people like me.

::Prosaic style does not harmonize with your editorial prerogative.  I understand that and admit I would be a poor Conservapedia contribitor.  However, your site and your interview on The Colbert Report prove that you are personally an intelligent man and believe your readers are intelligent as well.  I think there is room in this world for people like me.

::(As an aside, I took your "Quantifying Openmindedness" article self test and satisfied your basic criteria.  According to your "example questions and topics," I am not a polar ideological enemy of yours.  It would seem we merely respectfully disagree.)   

::(As an aside, I took your "Quantifying Openmindedness" article self test and satisfied your basic criteria.  According to your "example questions and topics," I am not a polar ideological enemy of yours.  It would seem we merely respectfully disagree.)