Siteadmin, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
2,144
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 59:
Line 59: − − ==Alphabet== − Excuse me, what was wrong with beginning stubs on the letters in the alphabet? And why did you block me for it? Not very fair in my opinion. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:58, 29 March 2007 (EDT) − − Mr. Schlafly has asked for more substantive articles. We need better articles on history, literature, science, economics, religion, etc. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 14:58, 29 March 2007 (EDT) − − ::That seems very short-sighted. Is this supposed to be comprehensive or not? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:00, 29 March 2007 (EDT) − − blocked "Flippin (contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 minute (too many new articles) − *That was to get your attention. In your case, please go for substantive over comprehensive. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:11, 29 March 2007 (EDT) − − We don't need to be so comprehensive as to state the obvious. I think anybody who's on this site knows that A is the first letter of the alphabet. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 15:14, 29 March 2007 (EDT) − − ::Substantive over comprehensive? In my case? With all due respect, who put you in charge of this project? I thought this was supposed to be a like-minded community of interested individuals who wanted to make something great--even greater than Wikipedia. You have dissuaded me of that perception. And, dare I say, in ''your'' case, I would rather you didn't try to intimidate new users, such as myself, in order to get the wiki you want---not the wiki they can create. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:16, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
move to appropriate talk page
Why would the use of a single standard NOT help in the writing of an article? Do you consider double standards desirable?
Why would the use of a single standard NOT help in the writing of an article? Do you consider double standards desirable?
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 14:32, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 14:32, 29 March 2007 (EDT)