284
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: + + + +
→Advice on speedy deletion: new section
:You're welcome. I'm glad I could help, and thank you for pointing out that the article needed references. If you have any more questions about Bible references, I definitely hope you can get them answered. If I'm around, I'll do my best. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 23:07, 11 December 2009 (EST)
:You're welcome. I'm glad I could help, and thank you for pointing out that the article needed references. If you have any more questions about Bible references, I definitely hope you can get them answered. If I'm around, I'll do my best. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 23:07, 11 December 2009 (EST)
== Advice on speedy deletion ==
Hi, I was just doing some housekeeping and adding all articles with deletion discussions to [[Conservapedia:Articles for deletion]]. But there remain lots of pages with deletion templates, but no corresponding discussion. Some seem rather obvious deletion candidates: Empty categories, redirects to deleted articles, almost empty pages, and a user page of a blocked user or two. I'm pretty new to Conservapedia, so I thought I'd ask before making a mistake and creating unnecessary work: Can those obvious candidates all be tagged for [[:Template:Db|speedy deletion]], or if not, when is speedy deletion appropriate and when is a deletion discussion required? Thanks in advance, [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 11:45, 12 December 2009 (EST)