740
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + + + + + + + + Line 76:
Line 84: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Reading law: Thanks
::So, my suggestion: "Name" in general ("SQL", "BASIC", "Macintosh"), with brand when it's a recognized part (ok, I know I'm being vague here, but you get the picture with "Windows Vista" and "Microsoft Office") and "Name (type)" only when we've got an article on another thing with that name ("Python (snake)", "C (letter of alphabet)"). I think that last caveat is a good way of distinguishing when the other thing with that name is significant enough to bump the programming concept to a disambiguating part of name.
::So, my suggestion: "Name" in general ("SQL", "BASIC", "Macintosh"), with brand when it's a recognized part (ok, I know I'm being vague here, but you get the picture with "Windows Vista" and "Microsoft Office") and "Name (type)" only when we've got an article on another thing with that name ("Python (snake)", "C (letter of alphabet)"). I think that last caveat is a good way of distinguishing when the other thing with that name is significant enough to bump the programming concept to a disambiguating part of name.
::Again, I'm sorry I'm so late getting back to you.--[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 12:37, 12 December 2009 (EST)
::Again, I'm sorry I'm so late getting back to you.--[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 12:37, 12 December 2009 (EST)
:It's a bit confusing, what you've said. There's nothing ambiguous about [[Microsoft Office]]; hence, no need for a type in parenthesis.
:When the issue of distinguishing between similar article titles first came up at Wikipedia, it was quickly decided that we '''omit''' the type whenever possible.
:Or is that what you were saying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:49, 12 December 2009 (EST)
::Yes, that's what I was saying. In general, just "Name" (sometimes the brand is part of the name); put "Name (type)" only when we already have an article on another thing with that name. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 12:52, 12 December 2009 (EST)
==About the Messianic Prophesy article==
==About the Messianic Prophesy article==
::Sorry, I took you for an admin and didn't check. I'll probably make sure and ask someone else before I start to make a mess. Anyway, thanks for the opinion. [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 12:35, 12 December 2009 (EST)
::Sorry, I took you for an admin and didn't check. I'll probably make sure and ask someone else before I start to make a mess. Anyway, thanks for the opinion. [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 12:35, 12 December 2009 (EST)
:::Oh, boy! First time I get mistaken for an admin - how exciting! :) Unfortunately, I don't think it'll be true for a while...--[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 12:38, 12 December 2009 (EST)
:::Oh, boy! First time I get mistaken for an admin - how exciting! :) Unfortunately, I don't think it'll be true for a while...--[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 12:38, 12 December 2009 (EST)
== Message ==
Just got a header saying I have new messages, but when I got there there was nothing new and you were the last to edit. What did you want to say, because I can't see it? [[User:CharlieT|CharlieT]] 13:06, 12 December 2009 (EST)
:I was just helping fix vandalism on your talk page. Check its history if you want to see. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 13:07, 12 December 2009 (EST)
::Ah, thanks for that! I tought something was broken. [[User:CharlieT|CharlieT]] 13:08, 12 December 2009 (EST)
== Thanks ==
For speedily catching that idiot vandal, and restoring my talk page, Evan. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small>/Admin</small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:51, 16 December 2009 (EST)
==A "word" of thanks==
Evan, thanks for helping with the redirect; I turned my reference to [[the Word]] into a direct link [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nestorianism&diff=734561&oldid=733438 here]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:02, 18 December 2009 (EST)
== Image requests ==
[http://www.conservapedia.com/File:LeftRiemann.png Left Riemann sum]
[http://www.conservapedia.com/File:MidRiemann.png Midpoint Riemann sum]
[http://www.conservapedia.com/File:RightRiemann.png Right Riemann sum]
[http://www.conservapedia.com/File:TrapezoidalRule.png Trapezoidal Rule]
[http://www.conservapedia.com/File:DoubleIntegral.png Double Integral]
[http://www.conservapedia.com/File:PrecessionNorth.gif Northern Precession]
[http://www.conservapedia.com/File:PrecessionSouth.gif Southern Precession]
[[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 02:39, 27 December 2009 (EST)
:Thanks a lot. It might be a little while (after the new year) before I get around to the Riemann Sum article, but I'll be there. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 10:39, 29 December 2009 (EST)
:'''UPDATE''': Both Precession pictures say [[Image:PrecessionNorth.gif|inline|100px|"Error creating thumbnail"]] whenever I try to embed them in an article at a different size than the default. Could you try to fix this? Thanks. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 10:47, 29 December 2009 (EST)
==Scottish Merge==
Thanks for responding so quickly to [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Scottish_Islands&diff=prev&oldid=740848 my merge request] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:08, 2 January 2010 (EST)
== Reading law ==
Just a friendly heads-up that articles created by Administrators shouldn't be re-directed without first posting a note on their talk pages. Geo is a very active Admin here, albeit mostly behind the scenes. We do have a "merge" template that you can use as well. Thanks! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:35, 18 January 2010 (EST)
:Oh, thanks. Is it okay to leave things as they are now? --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 15:38, 18 January 2010 (EST)