Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 20:40, December 12, 2009

295 bytes added ,  20:40, December 12, 2009
If you're suggesting that one force can affect the inertial in an entirely independent, orthogonal direction, that's illogical.
Line 14: Line 14:     
::Essentially your counterexample to relativity is that it makes a prediction that contradicts Newton's laws.  This is neithe r a contradiction nor a logical problem, and it is should be edited out.[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]]
 
::Essentially your counterexample to relativity is that it makes a prediction that contradicts Newton's laws.  This is neithe r a contradiction nor a logical problem, and it is should be edited out.[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]]
 +
 +
:::No, it's a logical problem.  If you're suggesting that one force can affect the inertial in an entirely independent, orthogonal direction, that's illogical.  One thing cannot affect something else that is entirely independent.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:40, 12 December 2009 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,331

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/730144"

Navigation menu