Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
294 bytes added ,  23:40, December 12, 2009
→‎Impossible?: Have you really seen these events that you describe? Don't believe everything that liberals tell you, as we've just seen with climategate
Line 75: Line 75:     
Actually this is not true. first off, the simplest explination of a black hole is an object so dense its escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. This density is known as the schrawtzshield radius (the spelling may be a bit off)This means there is mathematical proof. If this was not the case there would be no black holes Also, if black holes didnt exist we would never see objects being pulled into nothingness, or massive event horizons, which we do in fact see. --[[User:BenO|BenO]] 18:05, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 
Actually this is not true. first off, the simplest explination of a black hole is an object so dense its escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. This density is known as the schrawtzshield radius (the spelling may be a bit off)This means there is mathematical proof. If this was not the case there would be no black holes Also, if black holes didnt exist we would never see objects being pulled into nothingness, or massive event horizons, which we do in fact see. --[[User:BenO|BenO]] 18:05, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:Have you really seen these events that you describe?  Don't believe everything that liberals tell you, as we've just seen with [[climategate]].
 +
 +
:Your point about "mathematical proof" doesn't provide physical proof of anything.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:40, 12 December 2009 (EST)
    
Actually in science we cannot prove with 100% certainty that ''anything'' does not exist, you cannot prove a negative.  This opening sentence needs to be rewritten first for that reason, also for the fact that black holes have been indirectly observed via Accretion disks, gas jets, gravity lensing, radiation emissions, and other orbits of other stellar bodies.  Also there is no other valid explanation in science for the aforementioned effects of a black hole that we observe. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 17:00, 1 July 2009 (EST)
 
Actually in science we cannot prove with 100% certainty that ''anything'' does not exist, you cannot prove a negative.  This opening sentence needs to be rewritten first for that reason, also for the fact that black holes have been indirectly observed via Accretion disks, gas jets, gravity lensing, radiation emissions, and other orbits of other stellar bodies.  Also there is no other valid explanation in science for the aforementioned effects of a black hole that we observe. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 17:00, 1 July 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu