Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)

Revision as of 23:56, December 12, 2009

198 bytes added ,  23:56, December 12, 2009
→‎Kidneys: There's no logic in your objection. An intelligent designer is not constrained by an idiotic straight-jacket of consistency.
Line 670: Line 670:     
::::::Andy Schlafly already admitted that the extra kidney is, well, extra, and that a human doesn't need two kidneys.  I don't want to appear as a vandal on this site, I just wanted to make sure Mr. Schlafly shows a bit of humility, and perhaps quote a bible verse rather than just go on with his musing.[[User:Ssmith12|Ssmith12]] 18:44, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 
::::::Andy Schlafly already admitted that the extra kidney is, well, extra, and that a human doesn't need two kidneys.  I don't want to appear as a vandal on this site, I just wanted to make sure Mr. Schlafly shows a bit of humility, and perhaps quote a bible verse rather than just go on with his musing.[[User:Ssmith12|Ssmith12]] 18:44, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::::There's no logic in your objection.  An intelligent designer is not constrained by an idiotic straight-jacket of consistency.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:56, 12 December 2009 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/730283"

Navigation menu