Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
411 bytes removed ,  19:58, March 29, 2007
→‎Copernicus: not relevant to the point at hand - which is how to improve the Copernicus article
Line 156: Line 156:     
:::::: Yes, I am quite serious. If you have some evidence that I am wrong, please post it on [[Talk:Theory]]. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:11, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::: Yes, I am quite serious. If you have some evidence that I am wrong, please post it on [[Talk:Theory]]. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:11, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
  −
:: You should have tried to work with him instead of giving him a time out. [[User:Bob2|Bob2]] 14:18, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
  −
  −
:::Wow, he's been blocked...again...it's amazing what gets done when peoples POV clash. Shame that one of the best contributors to this site has been blocked (as i said before, again). You sysops are actually funny to watch. [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 14:25, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu