Added arguments against. Could someone add arguments for?
Line 1:
Line 1:
−
'''Open communion''' is the practice in some [[Christian]] [[Church|churches]] in which anyone who presents himself for [[Holy Communion]] will be served. Churches practicing open communion do not restrict communion based on [[Denomination|denominational]] affiliation but rather leave the decision to receive communion to the individual.
+
'''Open communion''' is the practice in some [[Christian]] [[Church|churches]] in which anyone who presents himself for [[Holy Communion]] will be served. Churches practicing open communion do not restrict communion based on [[Denomination|denominational]] affiliation or belief in Christ but rather leave the decision to receive communion to the individual.
+
+
==Arguments for and against==
+
<!-- Could someone who believes in it put in some arguments for? I'm strongly against it, for the reason given -->
+
Opponents of open communion cite the Apostle Paul's statement (I Corinthians 11:29) that "he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself" to say that unbelievers should not partake in the Lord's Supper. In addition, they say, Jesus was careful to not initiate the Lord's Supper until Judas the unbeliever had left.