Changes

=== '''Why does Conservapedia have articles on non-political topics?''' ===

=== '''Why does Conservapedia have articles on non-political topics?''' ===

Obviously, liberal bias can creep into Wikipedia's articles on subjects in religion, politics, philosophy, history, culture, and law.  It can also appear in articles in science (evolution, for example), or medicine (the effects of abortion).   

Obviously, liberal bias can creep into Wikipedia's articles on subjects in religion, politics, philosophy, history, culture, and law.  It can also appear in articles in science ([[evolution]], for example), or medicine (the effects of abortion).   

But there are additional problems with Wikipedia which Conservapedia addresses.  For example, many articles on Wikipedia are excessively long, providing extraneous detail that can muddle a subject.  Conservapedia offers concise, informative articles.  Readers who wish to explore a subject more in-depth are free to enroll in Conservapedias courses for home schooled students, but we do not have a whole courseworth of material on every subject.

But there are additional problems with Wikipedia which Conservapedia addresses.  For example, many articles on Wikipedia are excessively long, providing extraneous detail that can muddle a subject.  Conservapedia offers concise, informative articles.  Readers who wish to explore a subject more in-depth are free to enroll in Conservapedias courses for home schooled students, but we do not have a whole courseworth of material on every subject.