Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 225:
Line 225: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 22:11, December 15, 2009
, 22:11, December 15, 2009→Wind turbine line: The statement is incoherent, and doesn't fool anyone here. A turbine is not "a problem," for starters.
If you actually look at the article, tha caption of the turbine picture states:
If you actually look at the article, tha caption of the turbine picture states:
'Offshore wind turbines represent a modern multi disciplinary engineering problem.'; stating they rae not an example of fully competent engineering.
'Offshore wind turbines represent a modern multi disciplinary engineering problem.'; stating they rae not an example of fully competent engineering.
:The statement is incoherent, and doesn't fool anyone here. A turbine is not "a problem," for starters.
:The presentation of a picture of wind turbines creates the false impression that it IS "an example of fully competent engineering."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:11, 15 December 2009 (EST)