Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 201:
Line 201: − + Line 233:
Line 233: − Line 255:
Line 254: + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Liberal Denials about History (view source)
Revision as of 03:11, December 17, 2009
, 03:11, December 17, 2009I suspect you're more interested in trying to reject the Bible than giving it equal time in your activities. Am I right?
See Gilman Ostrander, The making of the Traignular trade myth, The william and mary quarterly, 3:30:4, 1973, pp 635-644
See Gilman Ostrander, The making of the Traignular trade myth, The william and mary quarterly, 3:30:4, 1973, pp 635-644
== Conservative Rant ==
== Reply ==
:REPLY:
:REPLY:
== "Liberal Response" ==
== "Liberal Response" ==
You're in absurd denial here. There's no disputing that a vast majority of wealth-enhancing inventions have been American.
You're in absurd denial here. There's no disputing that a vast majority of wealth-enhancing inventions have been American.
I'll do an [[Essay:Quantifying Open-Mindedness|open-mindedness test]] when you discover the "liberal art of citation of sources". I've seen no counter poiunts here except pointless logical fallacies.
I'll do an [[Essay:Quantifying Open-Mindedness|open-mindedness test]] when you discover the "liberal art of citation of sources". I've seen no counter poiunts here except pointless logical fallacies.
::You still won't admit that the vast majority of inventions have been American? Look, you have free will to deny basic facts, but your denial is astounding.
::Re: homeschooling, people and homeschooling were not that different 150 years ago. Moreover, you seem to confuse cause with effect. The point is about the positive effect of homeschooling, regardless of the motivation. I realize that Germany bans homeschooling and England is over-regulating it, but it remains productive at a far greater level than its percentages. And this has always been true, as numerous examples [[homeschooling|here]] illustrate.
::If you were genuinely interested in logic, then you'd spend some time reading or translating the Bible, the most logical book of all. But I suspect you're more interested in trying to reject the Bible than giving it equal time in your activities. Am I right?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:11, 16 December 2009 (EST)